---
id: "entity-matthew-call"
type: "entity"
source_timestamps: ["§ Why Employees Keep Quiet"]
tags: ["thought-leader", "cited-voice"]
related: ["framework-costs-of-ai-visibility", "concept-ai-knowledge-hiding"]
entityType: "person"
canonicalName: "Matthew Call"
aliases: []
speakers: ["Matthew Call"]
sources: ["execution"]
isSpeakerEntity: true
---
## Segment 8 — execution

## Article 76 — a076

# Matthew Call

**Role in the source:** Cited authority (not an author). Texas A&M business-school professor, quoted via a Wall Street Journal article.

**Attributed contributions in this vault:**
- Advises employees to use *personal* AI tools for their most valuable work rather than employer-provided ones, so their accumulated knowledge and workflows stay with them if they leave — rather than being extracted and used to replace them.
- This directly illustrates the **Replaceability Cost** in the [[framework-costs-of-ai-visibility]] and the incentive structure behind [[concept-ai-knowledge-hiding]] and [[contrarian-ai-silence-is-rational]].

**Enrichment / canonical anchor:** likely his Texas A&M faculty page. Used in the source as an authority on career risk, workflow ownership, and the incentive to keep high-value AI methods private.