---
id: "entity-arxiv"
type: "entity"
entityType: "organization"
canonicalName: "arXiv"
aliases: ["ArXiv"]
source_title: "Don't Let AI Slop Muck Up Your Company's Processes"
source_url: "https://hbr.org/2026/06/dont-let-ai-slop-muck-up-your-companys-processes"
source_timestamps: ["¶15"]
tags: ["repository", "academic"]
related: ["concept-knowledge-validation"]
sources: ["execution"]
sourceVaultSlug: "hbr-seg-execution"
originDay: 8
articleStem: "hbr-sig-54-ai-slop-processes"
sourceUrl: "https://hbr.org/2026/06/dont-let-ai-slop-muck-up-your-companys-processes"
sourceTitle: "Don’t Let AI Slop Muck Up Your Company’s Processes"
---
# arXiv

**Profile.** arXiv is a major open-access pre-print repository for scientific papers. Canonical reference: arxiv.org.

**Role in this source.** In May, arXiv announced that submitting papers containing AI hallucinations would earn the authors a yearlong ban — cited by the authors as evidence of the growing crisis of knowledge validation in research. This institutional sanction is a concrete instance of the [[concept-knowledge-validation|validation challenge]], implicitly heightening the importance of human-verified, accountable scholarship.

**Connections.** Related to the enrichment overlay's discussion of publication integrity and disclosure norms in the US national-lab study on knowledge workers.