---
id: "action-engage-governance"
type: "action-item"
source_timestamps: ["§ How Leaders Can Capture Value", "¶24"]
source_url: "https://hbr.org/2025/10/is-ai-a-boom-or-a-bubble"
source_title: "Is AI a Boom or a Bubble?"
tags: ["governance", "policy", "public-private-partnerships", "tech-governance"]
related: ["concept-regulatory-sandboxes", "concept-geopolitical-ai-acceleration"]
speakers: ["Paulo Carvão"]
action: "Participate in regulatory sandboxes and public-private AI governance partnerships."
outcome: "Influence over future AI regulations and sustained public trust in deployed technologies."
sources: ["futures"]
sourceVaultSlug: "hbr-seg-futures"
originDay: 2
articleStem: "hbr-foci-74-ai-boom-or-bubble"
sourceUrl: "https://hbr.org/2025/10/is-ai-a-boom-or-a-bubble"
sourceTitle: "Is AI a Boom or a Bubble?"
---
# Engage in Emerging Governance Frameworks

**Action:** Participate in [[concept-regulatory-sandboxes|regulatory sandboxes]] and public-private AI governance partnerships.
**Expected outcome:** Influence over future AI regulations and sustained public trust in deployed technologies.

Firms should engage **early**, while frameworks are still forming. This lets them experiment safely while gaining influence over how the AI economy is governed — ensuring adoption matches resilience and fair oversight. It is the strategic response to [[concept-geopolitical-ai-acceleration|state-led geopolitical acceleration]]: shape the rules rather than merely absorb them.


## Related across articles
- [[action-engage-regulators]]
- [[action-leverage-lobbying]]